FACTORS WHICH INFLUENCE LIQUID ASSETS IN SHARIA BANKS: A CASE STUDY OF PT BANK SYARIAH MANDIRI 2016-2017

Taryana Harun

Abstract


Banks manage liquidity carefully because of differences in fund tenor collected and channeled. Meanwhile, at the same time, it must fulfill transaction needs, reserve requirement, current liabilities, and be cautious in facing sudden liquidity needs. Therefore, bankshold a sufficient amount of liquid assets. Liquidity management tends to be a trade-off. On one side, insufficient liquid assets can cause banks to be unable to carry out transactions with its customers or fulfill its maturity obligations. On another side, high liquid assets can result in a lost opportunity, because the liquid assets do not provide a return. The purpose of this research is to analyze what factors influence the level of banks liquid assets. This research was conducted using a dual regression model to analyze the variables studied, with a case study of PT Bank Syariah Mandiri from 2016-2017.The dependent variable was the level of liquid assets. Meanwhile, the independent variables were the amount of third party funds, financing growth, financial market access between banks, current liabilities, and previous month profit. The research results reveal that two variables are statistically significant towards bank liquid assets, which are third-party funds and previous month profit. Third-party funds and previous month profit have a positive and significat influence towards liquid assets. Meanwhile, the other variables do not significantly determined liquid assets.


Keywords


Liquidity; liquid assets; third-party funds

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anam, A. Khoirul. (2013). Risiko Likuiditas dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kinerja Perbankan di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Vol. 10 No. 1, Economics and Business Faculty of Universitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara, 1-16.

Anwar, S. & Ali, A. M. H. (2018). Ann-Based Early Warning System for Indonesia Islamic Banks. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan Vol. 20 No. 3, Bank Indonesia, 325-341.

Arifin, Z. (2003). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Bank Syariah. Jakarta: Avabet.

Arifin, Z. (2009). Dasar-dasar Manajemen Bank Syariah, revised edition, Jakarta: Azkia.

Aspachs, O., Nier, E., & Tiesset, M. (2005). Liquidity, Banking Regulations, and the Macroeconomy (Evidence on Bank Liquidity Holdings from a Panel of UK-Resident Banks). London: The London School of Economics.

Bank for International Settlement. (2008). Principles for Sound Liquidity Risk Management and Supervision.

Bank Indonesia. Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 20/4/PBI/2018 tentang Rasio Intermediasi Makroprudensial dan Penyangga Likuiditas Makroprudensial Bagi Bank Umum Konvensional, Bank Umum Syariah, dan Unit Usaha Syariah.

Bank Syariah Mandiri. (2016). Annual Report 2015.

Bathaludin, M. Barik, Adhi P., Nur M, &A.W., Wahyu. (2012). Dampak Persistensi Ekses Likuiditas Terhadap Kebijakan Moneter, Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan Vol. 14, No. 3, Bank Indonesia, pp. 257-282.

Ikatan Bankir Indonesia (IBI). (2016), Manajemen Kesehatan Bank Berbasis Risiko, Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Ikit. (2018). Manajemen Dana Bank Syariah, Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Kumar, M. & Yadav, G. C. (2013). Liquidity Risk Management in Banks: A Conceptual Framework. AIMA Journal of Management & Research. Vol. 7, Is. 2/4, India. Article No. 3.

Islamic Financial Service Board. (2005). IFSB-1: Guiding Principles of Risk Management for Institutions (Other than Insurance Institutions) Offering Only Islamic Financial Services.

Martawireja, A. E. (2007). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Likuiditas pada Bank Syariah (Studi Kasus pada Bank Syariah Mandiri 2004-2006). Graduate Program of the University of Indonesia. Jakarta.

Nadia, S. (2010). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Likuiditas Bank Syariah (Studi Kasus Bank Syariah Mandiri). Economics and Business Faculty of Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.

Natsir, M. (2012). Analisis Tingkat Likuiditas pada Bank Pembangunan Daerah (Studi Kasus BPD Sulselbar, BPD Sulut, BPD Sumut, BPD Riau, BPD DKI, BPD Jabar, BPD Jatim, BPD Bali, BPD Kaltim, BPD Kalbar, dan BPD Papua). Economics and Business Faculty of Universitas Hasannudin, Makassar.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Peraturan OJK No. 65/POJK.03/2016 tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko bagi Bank Umum Syariah dan Unit Usaha Syariah.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2018). Statisik Perbankan. June 2018.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2018). Statisik Perbankan Syariah. June 2018.

Oz, E., Ali, M. M., Khokher, Z. U. R., & Rosman, R. (2016). Shariah Non-Compliance Risk in the Banking Sector: Impact on Capital Adequacy Framework of Islamic Banks. Working Paper Series: WP-05/03/2016. IFSB.

Rusyamsi, I. (1999). Asset Liability Management: Strategi Pengelolaan Aktiva Pasiva Bank. Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.

Van Greuning, H. & Bratanovic, S. B. (2009). Analyzing Banking Risk: A Framework for Assessing Corporate Governance and Risk Management. 3rd edition. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Wuryandani, G., Ginting, R. Iskandar, D., & Sitompul, Z. (2014). Pengelolaan Dana dan Likuiditas Bank, Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan Vol. 16, No. 3, Bank Indonesia, 247-276.

Yamin, I. & Tanujaya, H. (1993). Manajemen Asset & Liability Perbankan (Studi Kasus Bank Danamon). Management Master’s Degree Program of the University of Indonesia, Jakarta.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32833/majem.v9i2.114

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.